Idea in Brief

The Challenge

The United States stands at a crossroads as it struggles with how to pay for health care. Fee for service, the dominant model today, is widely recognized as the single biggest obstacle to improving health care delivery. The choice is between two fundamentally different approaches: capitation and bundled payments. The stakes are high, and the outcome will define the shape of the health care system for many years to come, for better or for worse.

The Danger

Although capitation may deliver modest savings in the short run, it is not the solution. It entrenches large existing systems, eliminates patient choice, promotes consolidation, limits competition, and perpetuates the lack of accountability for outcomes. Like fee for service, capitation will fail to drive true innovation in health care delivery.

The Opportunity

Bundled payments trigger competition among providers to create value where it matters—at the individual patient level—and will finally put health care on the right path. Robust proof-of-concept initiatives in the U.S. and abroad demonstrate that the challenges of transitioning to bundled payments are already being overcome.

The United States stands at a crossroads as it struggles with how to pay for health care. The fee-for-service system, the dominant payment model in the U.S. and many other countries, is now widely recognized as perhaps the single biggest obstacle to improving health care delivery.

A version of this article appeared in the July–August 2016 issue (pp.88–100) of Harvard Business Review.